
| This forum is proudly powered by Scientific Linux 6 | SL website Download SL Help Search Members |
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| redman |
Posted: Jul 20 2011, 11:02 AM
|
|||
![]() SLF Admin ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admins Posts: 1672 Member No.: 2 Joined: 8-April 11 |
-------------------- What is SL? - Forum Rules - Info on 3rd Party Repos - How to post images - How to post large text / config files
Desktop: Asus P5QPL-AM, Intel Dual-Core E6500, 4GB DDR2, Asus GeForce GT 430 1GB, SL6.4 x86_64 Test box: Intel S5000PSL, 2x Intel Xeon E5310, 8GB ECC DDR2 FB-Dimm, Asus GeForce GT 220 1GB, SL6.4 x86_64 |
|||
| louis-m |
Posted: Jul 20 2011, 06:54 PM
|
|
|
SLF Newbie Group: Members Posts: 12 Member No.: 490 Joined: 19-July 11 |
i wonder if they see kvm as an emerging competitor?
i know they recently announced support for centos but i think that was a cunning ploy to draw people away from rhel, thereby lowering rhel's turnover eventually. no rhel, no centos etc! i'm also not unsure whether it was an own goal as i've seen a few M$ admins of late start looking at centos and after a while, they have liked what they saw and starting looking at other distro's and open source eg untangle etc. the global recession is also changing M$ admins direction so something is going to give eventually, either a move to *nix or a rethink of the M$ licensing costs. |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |