
| This forum is proudly powered by Scientific Linux 6 | SL website Download SL Help Search Members |
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| AC=172 |
Posted: Jul 13 2012, 08:12 AM
|
|
|
SLF Newbie Group: Members Posts: 4 Member No.: 1693 Joined: 13-July 12 |
Hi,
when I try to install the ffmpeg library or any package related to it, such as gstreamer ffmpeg plug-in libavcodec53 libavdevice53 vlc I got the following error libavcodec53-0.10.2-54.el6.x86_64 requires libvpx.so.1()(64bit) The fact is that I do have the library VP8 SDK: $ ll /usr/lib64/libvpx* lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jul 7 20:45 /usr/lib64/libvpx.so -> libvpx.so.0.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jul 7 20:42 /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.0 -> libvpx.so.0.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jul 7 20:42 /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.0.0 -> libvpx.so.0.0.0 -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 402K Dec 21 2010 /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.0.0.0 lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 15 Jul 7 21:12 /usr/lib64/libvpx.so.1 -> libvpx.so.0.0.0 I am running SL6.2, kernel 2.6.32-220.23.1.el6.x86_64 Any suggestion to solve this issue is welcome! |
|
| tux99 |
Posted: Jul 13 2012, 09:02 AM
|
|
|
SLF Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1154 Member No.: 224 Joined: 28-May 11 |
What repo are you trying to install from and what repos do you have active?
This sounds like a repo conflict to me but you need to provide the complete output of the 'yum install' command for us to be able to debug this. Also did you create the symlink "/usr/lib64/libvpx.so.1" manually? You appear to have libvpx.so.0 installed, not libvpx.so.1. What's the output of: rpm -qa|grep vpx -------------------- My personal SL6 repository, specialized in audio/video software: http://pkgrepo.linuxtech.net/el6/
(can be used together with EPEL and ELRepo repositories) |
|
| AC=172 |
Posted: Jul 13 2012, 09:33 AM
|
|
|
SLF Newbie Group: Members Posts: 4 Member No.: 1693 Joined: 13-July 12 |
I didn't find an "attachment option", thus I pasted the outputs here: I hope it's still readble...
yes, I created libvpx.so.1 manually since I haven't found libvpx.so.1 in any repository. $ rpm -qa|grep vpx libvpx-utils-0.9.0-8.el6_0.x86_64 libvpx-0.9.0-8.el6_0.x86_64 libvpx-devel-0.9.0-8.el6_0.x86_64 $ yum repolist repo id repo name status adobe-linux-x86_64 Adobe Systems Incorporated 2 atrpms Red Hat Enterprise Linux 6 - x86_64 - ATrpms 2,219 elrepo ELRepo.org Community Enterprise Linux Repository - el6 202 epel Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux 6 - x86_64 7,547 rpmforge RHEL 6.2 - RPMforge.net - dag 4,391 rpmforge-extras RHEL 6.2 - RPMforge.net - extras 643 sl Scientific Linux 6.2 - x86_64 6,339 sl-security Scientific Linux 6.2 - x86_64 - security updates 1,012 sl6x Scientific Linux 6x - x86_64 6,339 sl6x-security Scientific Linux 6x - x86_64 - security updates 1,012 repolist: 29,706 $ yum -v install ffmpeg Details can be found here. Mod's edit: please read this item on how to post large pieces of text |
|
| tux99 |
Posted: Jul 13 2012, 10:17 AM
|
|
|
SLF Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1154 Member No.: 224 Joined: 28-May 11 |
Ok, you might as well remove that symlink as it's useless, libvpx.0 and libvpx.1 are different (libvpx.1 is in the libvpx-1.0 package, atrpms has it and my linuxtech repo has it).
The thing is you have made the classic mistake that most newbies to SL / Centos / RH do (it's nothing to be ashamed of, we all live and learn! ), i.e. you have enabled loads of conflicting third party repos.You need to decide between atrpms or rpmforge or epel (elrepo can stay enabled as it generally plays nice with any of them). (alternatively there is also my linuxtech repo which is specialised in audio/video packages and has quite a few packages that none of the others have so might be interesting to you too, depending on what you are interested in) My personal opinion about each of these: atrpms: large choice of packages and generally quite bleeding edge, but packages are of very varying quality rpmforge: large choice and good quality packages but quite dated versions epel: large choice and good quality packages, but lack of support for many controversial A/V codecs and packages linuxtech: (my repo so I'm biased!) smaller choice of packages but focussed on A/V stuff with quite a few interesting packages that no other repo has, packages are mostly recent versions, good quality of packages, very wide support for A/V codecs Also check what packages you have already installed from any of these three repos before choosing which one you go for as that will necessarily influence your decision. -------------------- My personal SL6 repository, specialized in audio/video software: http://pkgrepo.linuxtech.net/el6/
(can be used together with EPEL and ELRepo repositories) |
|
| redman |
Posted: Jul 13 2012, 10:44 AM
|
|
![]() SLF Admin ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Admins Posts: 1705 Member No.: 2 Joined: 8-April 11 |
General info on 3rd party repos can be found here,
including info on which ones not to mix. -------------------- What is SL? - Forum Rules - Info on 3rd Party Repos - How to post images - How to post large text / config files
Desktop: ASUS P5QPL-AM, Intel Dual-Core E6500, 4GB DDR2, ASUS GeForce GT 430 1GB, SL6.4 x86_64 Laptop: ASUS X58L, Intel Dual-Core T3200, 3GB DDR2, Intel GMA X3100, RHEL6.4 x86_64 Test box: Intel S5000PSL, 2x Intel Xeon E5310, 8GB ECC DDR2 FB-DIMM, ASUS GeForce GT 220 1GB, SL6.4 x86_64 |
|
| AC=172 |
Posted: Jul 13 2012, 01:06 PM
|
|
|
SLF Newbie Group: Members Posts: 4 Member No.: 1693 Joined: 13-July 12 |
Many thanks for the advices.
I disabled the conflicting repositories, I left atrpms but yum search libvpx-1.0 returns nothing. And, of course, I still cannot install ffmpeg. (thanks Mod for cleaning up my post) |
|
| tux99 |
Posted: Jul 13 2012, 01:13 PM
|
|||
|
SLF Guru ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 1154 Member No.: 224 Joined: 28-May 11 |
libvpx-1.0 is in atrpms testing. I find http://pkgs.org is a good place to search for available packages but I recommend to always install packages with yum, not by downloading them via pkgs.org. http://pkgs.org/search/?keyword=libvpx&search_on=name&distro=82&arch=64-bit P.S: this is a good example of why I consider atrpms packages of 'varying' quality. A package in the main repo should never depend on a package in the testing repo that's disabled by default. (the other way round would be ok) -------------------- My personal SL6 repository, specialized in audio/video software: http://pkgrepo.linuxtech.net/el6/
(can be used together with EPEL and ELRepo repositories) |
|||
| AC=172 |
Posted: Jul 13 2012, 03:17 PM
|
|
|
SLF Newbie Group: Members Posts: 4 Member No.: 1693 Joined: 13-July 12 |
Great!
It worked! Thanks! |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |