
| This forum is proudly powered by Scientific Linux 6 | SL website Download SL Help Search Members |
| Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register ) | Resend Validation Email |
![]() ![]() ![]() |
| Nathan |
Posted: Mar 11 2012, 08:48 PM
|
|
![]() SLF Geek ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 288 Member No.: 928 Joined: 15-October 11 |
I've been messing around a bit with Petite Linux on my netbook this weekend, and decided I'd love to use Enlightenment instead of GNOME on Scientific Linux once I upgrade to SL 6.2. How would one go about installing it? I tried the packages from the official site, but I already get errors (Nothing to be done for ...) when trying to install eina.
EDIT: also, it'd be wonderful if someone could list all the packages needed to run Enlightenment from a JeOS. Thanks! |
|
| AndrewSerk |
Posted: Mar 12 2012, 03:26 PM
|
|
![]() SLF Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 524 Member No.: 54 Joined: 14-April 11 |
Hi Nathan,
I was looking at the Enlightenment.org web site for you and found they have a list of Recommended requirements along with the package build order on this page: http://enlightenment.org/p.php?p=download&l=en They also provide rhel6 packages and repo that should work with SL: http://download.enlightenment.org/releases/RHEL6/ Did you try to do your install from there e-rhel6.repo ? Hope this helps This post has been edited by AndrewSerk: Mar 12 2012, 03:26 PM |
|
| AndrewSerk |
Posted: Mar 12 2012, 03:48 PM
|
|||||
![]() SLF Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 524 Member No.: 54 Joined: 14-April 11 |
I was able to install all the packages from there repo here on my i686 test box. I first created a repo file.
and then listed the packages from there repo for install:
I have not done any testing of the packages just installed them without issue. Hope this helps, |
|||||
| Nathan |
Posted: Mar 12 2012, 04:30 PM
|
|
![]() SLF Geek ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 288 Member No.: 928 Joined: 15-October 11 |
Oh wow, I can't believe I missed that, thanks! I'll check it out in a minute and I'll let you know if it works properly.
|
|
| Nathan |
Posted: Mar 12 2012, 05:15 PM
|
|||
![]() SLF Geek ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 288 Member No.: 928 Joined: 15-October 11 |
Well, the packages installed correctly, so I downloaded the Enlightenment (16) tarball from SourceForge, extracted it, and
Any ideas why this is happening? Nevermind, figured it out, I didn't have the devel package installed. Anyhow, looks like it's still only going to be possible to install E16 with those RHEL6 packages. E17 doesn't seem to be available in RPM. |
|||
| AndrewSerk |
Posted: Mar 12 2012, 05:43 PM
|
|
![]() SLF Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 524 Member No.: 54 Joined: 14-April 11 |
just downloaded and installed the e16-1.0.10-1.fc14.i686.rpm from: http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/enlightenment/e16-1.0.10-1.fc14.i686.rpm?download without issue.
I first installed the packages from my above post then downloaded the e16-1.0.10-1.fc14.i686.rpm package and did a --locallinstall --nogpgcheck . Yum pulled in imlib2 1.4.4-1.el6.rf from rpmforge as the only dep. I haven't tried to use enlightenment yet on SL. I don't really know much about what packages are needed and what packages are not needed ect. for enlightenment to work and will have to RTFM for more info. This post has been edited by AndrewSerk: Mar 12 2012, 05:44 PM |
|
| Nathan |
Posted: Mar 12 2012, 05:45 PM
|
|
![]() SLF Geek ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 288 Member No.: 928 Joined: 15-October 11 |
Yeah, I just figured out I didn't have the imlib2-devel package installed, I'll give it another try now.
|
|
| AndrewSerk |
Posted: Mar 12 2012, 05:48 PM
|
|
![]() SLF Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 524 Member No.: 54 Joined: 14-April 11 |
Just logged out and in with e16 Gnome2 and it Works!
This post has been edited by AndrewSerk: Mar 12 2012, 05:50 PM |
|
| Nathan |
Posted: Mar 12 2012, 06:15 PM
|
|
![]() SLF Geek ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 288 Member No.: 928 Joined: 15-October 11 |
Alright, the package installed correctly, without further errors. Now, is there any way I can set GDM to login to Enlightenment, or will I have to install SLiM (or similar)?
This post has been edited by AndrewSerk: Mar 12 2012, 06:31 PM |
|
| AndrewSerk |
Posted: Mar 12 2012, 06:31 PM
|
|
![]() SLF Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 524 Member No.: 54 Joined: 14-April 11 |
Hi Nathan,
From the GDM log in screen you can choose what to use. The options selector is at the bottom in the "tool bar" before you log in. Just select what you want to use from the list of installed DM's (kde, gnome,e16,gnome2 e16 ect.) and that option should be automatically selected for your next log in . So no real need for SLIM etc. Hope this helps, |
|
| Nathan |
Posted: Mar 12 2012, 07:16 PM
|
|
![]() SLF Geek ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 288 Member No.: 928 Joined: 15-October 11 |
Thanks for the info. I tried E16 and E16 GNOME, both worked as they should. Now I went back to GNOME, but Enlightenment is still there, as if I had selected E16 GNOME again. I rebooted, problem persists. I erased the Enlightenment install with yum, still there after reboot. How is this even possible? lol
Might have found a fix, brb logout. |
|
| Nathan |
Posted: Mar 12 2012, 07:23 PM
|
|
![]() SLF Geek ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 288 Member No.: 928 Joined: 15-October 11 |
Alright, for anyone having trouble getting the normal GNOME back after logging into E16 GNOME: you'll need to edit the file '.gconf/desktop/gnome/session/required_components/%gconf.xml' in your home directory. You need to change the value 'e16' to 'metacity' or 'compiz' (depending on which you use) and save the file. Log out and back in, and Enlightenment will have disappeared. However, there won't be any window borders and it'll act a bit like Windows. To get everything working again, go to System -> Preferences -> Desktop Effects and click on Standard or Compiz. This should fix all problems.
|
|
| AndrewSerk |
Posted: Mar 12 2012, 08:13 PM
|
|
![]() SLF Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 524 Member No.: 54 Joined: 14-April 11 |
Nice catch/fix Nathan,
I missed that issue working from a disk img. as I reverted to the old img. after confirming that e16 installed and worked. Glad you got it all sorted out. This post has been edited by AndrewSerk: Mar 12 2012, 08:14 PM |
|
| Nathan |
Posted: Mar 12 2012, 10:22 PM
|
|
![]() SLF Geek ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 288 Member No.: 928 Joined: 15-October 11 |
Hmm. I've been searching all over the place and it seems the guys at SUSE are the only ones that have all the latest Enlightenment packages available as RPM. They aren't even in Fedora!
|
|
| AndrewSerk |
Posted: Mar 12 2012, 11:56 PM
|
|
![]() SLF Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 524 Member No.: 54 Joined: 14-April 11 |
If you have a test box/VM you might want to build there git/svn version?
: http://www.enlightenment.org/p.php?p=contribute&l=enThere trunk looks to be very active: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/browser/trunk |
|
| Nathan |
Posted: Mar 13 2012, 12:15 AM
|
|||||
![]() SLF Geek ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 288 Member No.: 928 Joined: 15-October 11 |
Well, downloading the packages isn't really the problem, but make gives me errors à la "Nothing to be done for". Below, the output for make and the subsequent make install (my apologies for the size of it, there doesn't seem to be a spoiler tag on this forum so I can't make my post smaller). My understanding of make is too limited to understand why it is producing these errors.
|
|||||
| AndrewSerk |
Posted: Mar 13 2012, 04:47 AM
|
|
![]() SLF Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 524 Member No.: 54 Joined: 14-April 11 |
Did you run the autogen.sh script first?
|
|
| Nathan |
Posted: Mar 13 2012, 01:45 PM
|
|
![]() SLF Geek ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 288 Member No.: 928 Joined: 15-October 11 |
Nope, never done that, I'll give it a try tonight and let you know the results.
|
|
| Nathan |
Posted: Mar 13 2012, 05:20 PM
|
|
![]() SLF Geek ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 288 Member No.: 928 Joined: 15-October 11 |
Didn't help, too bad.
|
|
| AndrewSerk |
Posted: Mar 14 2012, 04:39 AM
|
|||
![]() SLF Moderator ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Moderators Posts: 524 Member No.: 54 Joined: 14-April 11 |
That's a bummer I just built e16-1.0.10-2.fc17.i686 with fedpkg and the build suffered from the same ......%gconf.xml issue. If I can find some more time I'll give the git version a try and post any findings. |
|||
| Nathan |
Posted: Mar 17 2012, 08:48 PM
|
|
![]() SLF Geek ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Group: Members Posts: 288 Member No.: 928 Joined: 15-October 11 |
Well, I just did a fresh install of SL6.2 on my netbook, installed gcc and make, downloaded eina-1.10, extracted, entered the directory, did ./configure, did make and once again the same errors popped up. Make keeps telling me there is "nothing to be done for `all'".
I'll try installing make 3.82 from source and try again with that, as it isn't available in the SL repos. EDIT: interesting, installing make 3.82 also failed. Could this be a bug in make 3.81 in RHEL? |
|
![]() |
![]() ![]() ![]() |